GYIG OpenIR  > 研究生  > 学位论文
喀斯特流域硫同位素地球化学与碳酸盐岩侵蚀
其他题名Sulfur Isotope Geochemistry and Carbonate Weathering in Karst Catchment
蒋颖魁
2007-05-28
学位授予单位中国科学院地球化学研究所
学位授予地点地球化学研究所
学位名称博士
关键词喀斯特 河水 硫酸盐 水化学 硫同位素 碳酸盐岩 风化 土壤
摘要贵州的乌江流域属典型的喀斯特地貌,也是我国严重的酸雨区之一。酸沉降可以导致土壤中盐基离子的流失并释放出具有植物毒性的元素,对植被和生态造成破坏。即使在酸沉降停止后,土壤的退化也会持续,pH值仍可继续降低。因此,加强乌江流域的酸沉降对土壤及生态系统破坏的研究十分必要。乌江中上游地区广泛分布高硫煤和矿床硫化物,煤中的还原态硫化物(主要是黄铁矿)和矿床硫化物经过氧化风化会产生大量的溶解态金属和H2SO4,在污染环境的同时会大大加速碳酸盐岩的化学侵蚀。 本研究在导师刘丛强研究员主持的中国科学院知识创新工程重要方向重大项目(喀斯特地区(贵州乌江流域)物质的水文地球化学循环及其环境效应,批准号:KZCX2-105;乌江流域典型喀斯特土壤-植被生态系统生源要素生物地球化学研究,批准号:KZCX3-SW-140)课题的支持下,选择贵州喀斯特地区的典型河流为研究对象,利用化学质量平衡、同位素地球化学研究手段,探讨了硫酸风化碳酸盐岩对河水化学组成的影响,溶解硫酸盐的来源及硫同位素组成的时空变化,定量计算了丰水期乌江流域硫酸风化碳酸盐岩的侵蚀速率及其对大气CO2释放的影响,并对土壤总硫和硫酸盐的生物地球化学循环进行了同位素示踪研究。获得的主要结论揭示了水-岩作用和人类活动对硫的生物地球化学循环的控制机理,以及硫循环在碳酸盐岩化学风化中的作用,为了解喀斯特地区硫的循环演化及其环境效应提供了重要的基础科学依据。主要结论如下: 硫酸侵蚀碳酸盐岩对河水化学组成的影响 乌江枯、丰水期河水SO42−平均浓度分别为0.65mmol/L和0.48mmol/L,占阴离子总量的25%以上。干流河水SO42−浓度具有从上游到下游逐渐降低的趋势,支流河水SO42−浓度具有明显的区域性差异特征,枯水期上游和下游地区支流的SO42−平均浓度分别为0.80mmol/L和0.26mmol/L,丰水期河水也有类似的特征。SO42−、NO3−、Cl−与Na+浓度比值的相互关系表明河水SO42−具有人为来源。沅江水系河水SO42−含量远低于乌江河水,枯水期平均浓度0.22mmol/L,丰水期平均0.14mmol/L。 乌江流域不同来源H2SO4参与下的碳酸盐岩风化是影响河水化学组成最主要的因素。舞阳河水中的溶质主要来自H2CO3风化白云岩,不存在硫酸风化碳酸盐岩的迹象。清水江河水离子组成则同时受到H2CO3、H2SO4风化碳酸盐岩和H2CO3风化硅酸盐的影响。由此可见,喀斯特地区不同河流的河水化学组成受H2SO4风化碳酸盐岩的影响是不同的。 水-岩作用模拟表明:乌江枯水期河水的CSI在−0.2 ~ 1之间,绝大多数河水处于对CaCO3过饱和状态,丰水期河水的CSI较枯水期平均高0.3,CaCO3全部过饱和。河水PCO2,river相对大气PCO2,atm一般是过饱和的。因此,喀斯特地区河水即具有沉积性又具有向大气释放CO2的趋势。舞阳河水方解石和白云石在枯、丰水期全部过饱和,DSI平均值在两季均远高于CSI,这与舞阳河流域分布着大量的白云岩有关。而清水江大部分河水的方解石和白云石处于不饱和状态。流域不同的地质背景决定了河水中方解石和白云石的饱和状态,在同一地质背景条件下又取决于河水中的CO2分压。 扣除乌江丰水期河水化学组成中H2SO4溶解碳酸盐岩的贡献之后,部分河水由对方解石和白云石过饱和变为不饱和,溶解沉淀性质发生了根本的改变。由此可见,H2SO4风化碳酸盐岩通过改变河水的化学组成,对河水的化学稳定性也存在很大影响。 河水硫同位素地球化学与碳酸盐岩侵蚀 枯水期乌江河水硫同位素δ34S值的变化范围为−15.7‰ 到18.9‰,宽广的δ34S值范围反映了不同河段汇入的SO42−来源于流经具有不同同位素组成特征地质背景的支流。丰水期δ34S值的变化范围小于枯水期,在−11.5‰ 到8.3‰之间。两个季节河水SO42−的δ34S值均随着SO42−浓度的增加而降低。乌江硫酸盐的硫同位素组成具有明显的季节性变化,丰水期干流河水的δ34S值在−6.7‰ ~ −3.9‰之间,平均值较枯水期低3‰。支流河水的硫同位素组成具有明显的区域性差异。舞阳河河水富集34S,清水江河水富集32S,硫同位素组成的季节变化和支流差异远不如乌江明显。 硫同位素示踪显示:乌江上游河水硫酸盐主要来自煤中黄铁矿的氧化、矿床硫化物氧化及雨水;下游河水硫酸盐的硫同位素组成主要介于雨水和蒸发岩端元之间,煤中黄铁矿氧化的贡献较少。不同端元的硫同位素组成表明:丰水期水量增加时,煤中黄铁矿氧化来源的硫酸盐的贡献增加,导致了乌江河水δ34S值的降低。雨水δ34S值季节性变化对河水硫同位素组成的季节性变化的影响是次要的。 乌江河水向贵州省外输出的SO42−通量为170×1010g/a,丰水期占全年SO42−输出总量的72%,上游地区输出的SO42−占年输出总量的80%。煤中黄铁矿风化、雨水、矿床硫化物风化、蒸发岩溶解对丰水期乌江河水SO42-的贡献分别为45%、27%、24%和4%。硫化物氧化产生H2SO4,而后H2SO4侵蚀碳酸盐岩,这是研究区内两个非常重要的硫循环过程。丰水期H2SO4侵蚀碳酸盐岩的速率为35.1t/ (km2•a),约合17.5mm/ka。总的CO2释放通量约为8.1 t/ (km2•a)。通过推导丰水期乌江流域碳酸盐岩侵蚀方程可知,丰水期乌江流域碳酸盐岩的侵蚀有52%是由H2SO4风化造成的。 喀斯特流域土壤硫的生物地球化学 黄壤的总硫含量一般小于0.1%,而石灰土的总硫含量全部大于0.1%, 同一剖面同样深度黄壤总硫含量夏季生长期高于冬季休眠期,但是石灰土则恰恰相反。一般情况下,土壤总硫含量首先与土壤类型有关,其次可能受到植被的影响。即使是同一土壤类型,随着剖面深度的增加总硫含量变化趋势也并不一致。 土壤无机硫酸盐的含量与土壤类型密切相关,黄壤SO42−含量明显高于石灰土。黄壤表层土硫酸盐形态硫占总硫的2.4% ~ 6.4%,随着剖面加深土壤硫酸盐形态硫的含量出现先增加后降低的趋势,最高可占总硫的20%以上,这种现象应该是铁、铝氧化物或氢氧化物对硫酸盐的吸附造成的。同样是黄壤,也可能由于上覆植被的不同造成不同剖面土壤硫酸盐在含量上的差异,或同一剖面不同季节含量上的差异。石灰土硫酸盐形态硫在总硫中的百分含量不超过3%,而且易受淋溶而流失,即使在有植被覆盖的情况下也是如此。 所有样品总硫的δ34S值均为正值且总是大于同层SO42−的δ34S值。随着黄壤剖面的加深δ34S值呈逐渐增加的趋势,有机硫循环过程不断富集34S可能是产生这种现象的原因。 硫同位素组成表明黄壤剖面表层土SO42−应来源于大气沉降。夏季表层土SO42−的δ34S值稍高于冬季,明显高于贵阳夏季大气降水的硫同位素组成,可能是大气总沉降的反映,也可能是不同季节土壤有机硫的矿化水平的不同造成的。黄壤剖面无论冬季还是夏季SO42−均随剖面的加深逐渐富集34S。在剖面上层SO42−的δ34S值与SO42−含量正相关,可能是有机硫矿化生成的SO42−加入的结果。下层土壤硫酸盐δ34S值与含量明显反相关,可能是硫酸盐还原菌发生作用导致了较大的同位素分馏。 从乌江上游至下游,石灰土表层土壤SO42−的硫同位素逐渐富集32S。硫同位素组成表明中、下游石灰土SO42−的来源很可能是大气降水,而上游样品还存在矿山硫的来源。 土壤无机硫酸盐对乌江河水硫酸盐的贡献还不明确,但它不应是乌江河水硫酸盐的主要来源。
其他摘要Wujiang River catchment is the typical karst landform, also is one of the most seriously acid rain areas in our country. Elevated atmospheric input of SOx into catchment is detrimental, because it accelerates the depletion of nutrient basic cations from soils, and increases the concentrations of acidic cations (H+, Al3+) in soil porewater and surface water, resulting in the destruction of vegetation and ecology. Even after the acid deposition stop, the soil degeneration can also continue, and the pH may decrease continually. Therefore, it is extremely necessary to strengthen the research on the soil and ecosystem destruction caused by acid deposition in Wujiang River catchement. In the middle and upper reaches of Wujiang River catchment, sulfur-enriching (mainly pyrite) coal and deposit sulfide are widespread. The sulfide may be oxidized to produce massive free metal cations and sulfuric acid, which pollute environment and accelerate the carbonate weathering. This research study has been carried out under the financial support of Chinese Academy of Sciences, through the research grants KZCX2-105 (Hydro-geochemical cycling of substances in karstic terrain (Wujiang River catchments and its environmental effect) and KZCX3-SW-140 (A geochemical study on nutrient cycling in karstic soil-plant ecological system of the Wujiang River catchment). Some typical rivers in the karst regions of Guizhou Province have been selected as the objects of study. By making use of chemical mass equilibriums and isotope geochemical approaches, the influence of carbonate weathering by sulfuric acid on chemical composition of river water, sources of dissolved sulfate and its temporal and spatial variations of sulfur isotopic composition are discussed / investigated. The weathering of carbonate by sulfuric acid and it’s influence on the release of CO2 to Wujiang River catchment during high-flow period have been calculated on quantitative basis. Meanwhile, the sulfur isotopic compositions of total sulfur (S) and inorganic sulfate in solid phases are used as a tag on the pathways for sulfur biogeochemistry transformations in soil. The results obtained in this work are of significances for better understanding of the factors controlling the sulfur biogeochemistry cycle and their cycling role of sulfur in chemical weathering rate of carbonate, which can be used as an important scientific theoretical base for understanding sulfur evolutions and its environment impact in karstic terrain. The main conclusions have been summarized as follows: The influence of carbonate weathering by sulfuric acid on chemical composition of river water The sulfate (SO42−) accounts for more than 25% of the total anions in Wujiang River water; the average SO42− concentration is 0.65mmol/L during low-flow period, 0.17mmol/L higher than that during high-flow period. The dissolved sulfate concentration of mainstream decreases gradually from upstream to downstream. Spatial variations in SO42− concentration of tributaries over the catchment area are obvious: 0.80mmol/L and 0.26mmol/L in upstream and downstream tributary water during low-flow period, respectively. River water samples collected during high-flow period also have similar characteristics. The good positive correlation between SO42−/Na+ and NO3−/Na+, and also SO42−/Na+ and Cl−/Na+ during high-flow period, suggest that the areas may be partly affected by human activities. The SO42− concentrations of Yuanjiang River water are 0.22mmol/L and 0.14mmol/L during low-flow and high-flow period, respectively, far lower than that of Wujiang main stream river water. Carbonate weathering by both sulfuric acid and carbonic acid are the most important factor that affects the Wujiang River water chemistry. The solutes in Wuyang River come mostly from weathering of dolomite; there is no indication of carbonate weathering by sulfuric acid. In Qingshui river carbonate weathering by sulfuric acid, by carbonic acid and silicate weathering by carbonic acid contribute the water chemistry. Thus it can be seen that the influences of carbonate weathering by sulfuric acid on the chemical composition of river water are different from rivers in karstic region. The CSI (Calcite Saturation Index), which is computed by water-rock interaction simulation, ranges between −0.2 and 1 in Wujiang River water sampled during low-flow period, great majority of the samples are calcite supersaturated. The average CSI of high-flow period samples are 0.3 higher than that of low-flow period samples, and all the samples are calcite supersaturated. Generally the water samples are supersaturated with PCO2 in river relative to the atmosphere. The results indicate that both calcite depositing and CO2 outgassing from river water are possibly. The calcite and dolomite in all the samples from Wuyang River are supersaturated and average DSI (Dolomite Saturation Index) is far higher than average CSI, whereas the CSI and DSI of most of the samples from the Qingshui River lower than 1, namely, unsaturated. The CSI and DSI differences of both rivers are mainly related to different lithology of drainage catchments, dolomitic limestone in Wuyang River catchment and detrital sedimentary rocks in Qingshui River catchment. In general, the CSI and DSI interrelated with lithology of drainage catchments firstly, and the PCO2, river secondly. After deducting the solute contributed by carbonate weathering by sulfuric acid from chemical composition of Wujiang River water sampled during high-flow period, the deposition-dissolution characters of calcite and dolomite changed significantly. In partial samples CSI and DSI become < 1 from being > 1 before. Thus it can be concluded that the process of carbonate weathering by sulfuric acid, via changing the chemical composition, has significant influence on the chemical stability of river water. Sulfur isotope geochemistry of river water and carbonate weathering The δ34S values of Wujiang River range from −15.7‰ to 18.9‰ during low-flow period, the wide spread in δ34S values suggests that the sulfur load in different segments of the river is controlled by primarily inputs from small streams draining geological terrains with isotopically distinct signatures. The δ34S values vary in a lesser extent during high-flow period than during low-flow period, from −11.5‰ to 8.3‰. In both seasons the δ34S value decreases with the increasing sulfate concentration. A pronounced seasonal variation in isotopic composition of sulfate characterizes the Wujiang River. The δ34S values of the mainstream range from −6.7‰ to −3.9‰ in summer, which is on average 3‰ lower than winter. Spatial variation in sulfur isotopic composition of tributaries over the catchment area is obvious. Wuyang River is in rich of 34S, whereas Qingshui River is characteristic by enriching 32S. The temporal and spatial variations of δ34S values of both rivers are far less significant than Wujiang River. According to the variations in sulfate concentration and isotopic composition, it can inferred that the sulfate ions in the upper-reach of Wujiang River waters may have three distinct sources, rain water, sulfate produced by the oxidation of pyrite in coal, and sulfate from sulfides deposits. In the lower reaches, the S isotopic composition of the samples lie mainly on a mixing trend between evaporite sulfate and rainwater sulfate, the contribution of sulfate from oxidation of pyrite being lesser. The sulfur isotopic composition of different end members suggests that when the discharge increases during high-flow period, the contribution of sulfate produced by the oxidation of pyrite in coal increases, which results in the decrease of δ34S values of river water. The δ34S values seasonal variation of rain is the minor reason for the Wujiang River. The SO42− export flux of Wujiang River is calculated approximately 172×1010 g/a. The upper-reach export flux accounts for 80% of the total. The high-flow period export flux accounts for 72% of the total, with contributions from pyrite oxidation in coal, rain, sulfides deposits and evaporite of 45%, 27%, 24% and 4%, respectively. Sulfide oxidation (sulfuric acid production) and subsequent weathering of carbonate are important processes in the study area. During high-flow period, the weathering rate of carbonate by sulfuric acid is on the order of 35.1t/(km2•a) (17.5mm/ka) and the total CO2 releasing flux is approximately 8.1 t/ (km2•a). By deducing the equation of carbonate dissolution, we speculate that 52% of the weathered carbonate comes by in contact with sulfuric acid during high-flow period. Soil sulfur biogeochemistry in karstic catchment Total S concentrations in yellow soil are usually lower than 1% throughout the entire profile, whereas in limestone soil the values are always higher than 1%. In the same soil depth of a profile, total S concentration in yellow soil is higher in summer (the growing season) than in winter (the dormant season), but the situation of limestone soil is quite contrary. In general, total S concentrations in soil have significant relation with soil type, and then, the aboveground vegetation type. The variations of total S concentration with depth are not uniform even in different profiles of same soil type. Inorganic soil sulfate (free plus adsorbed SO42−) contents are markedly relevant to soil types, distinctively higher in yellow soil than in dolomite soil. In topsoil of yellow soil profiles, inorganic sulfate form 2.4% to 6.4% of total soil S. In yellow soil profiles, the proportion of inorganic sulfate increases with increasing soil depth and attains maximum, more than 20% of total S, in the depth interval between 0 ~ 45cm, most probably arising from the adsorption by free iron and aluminum oxides or hydroxides, and then decreases. Sulfate contents differ with different aboveground vegetation type in yellow soil profiles, the seasonal variations of it may be caused by the same reason. Sulfate-S in dolomite soil accounts for no more than 3% of total S, even if the aboveground vegetation is in good condition, it can be washed away easily from soil because of eluviation. Total S of all the samples are enriched with 34S and the δ34S values are always higher than that of inorganic sulfate. With increasing depth in yellow soil profiles, the δ34S values of total S increase, this may be the result of organic S cycle in which organic S become more and more enriched in 34S. The sulfur isotopic composition suggests that the inorganic sulfate in topsoil of yellow soil profiles is mainly from atmospheric deposition. The δ34S values of inorganic sulfate in topsoil are higher in summer than in winter and distinctively higher than the δ34S values of rainfall sulfate in summer, suggesting that the inorganic sulfate came from total deposition, not only wet but also dry depositions. It is also possible that the organic S mineralization increases in summer, which results in the δ34S values differences of inorganic sulfate mentioned above. The δ34S values of inorganic sulfate increase with yellow soil depth both in summer and winter. There is a remarkable positive correlation between the δ34S values and contents of inorganic sulfate in the upper horizon soil, whereas in the lower horizon soil, the δ34S values and contents of inorganic sulfate become significantly negative correlate. The former may be caused by the addition of sulfate from organic S, and the latter most probably is the result of dissimilatory reduction of sulfate. The inorganic sulfate in topsoil of dolomite soil profiles become more and more enriched in 32S from upper part to lower part of Wujiang River catchment. The sulfur isotopic composition suggests that the inorganic sulfate is mainly from rainfall, except the upper part samples in which the sulfur from mine may be another source. The contribution of soil sulfur to Wujiang River water is still not unclear but it can be concluded that soil sulfur is not an important sulfate sources to Wujiang River water.
页数117
语种中文
文献类型学位论文
条目标识符http://ir.gyig.ac.cn/handle/352002/3170
专题研究生_研究生_学位论文
推荐引用方式
GB/T 7714
蒋颖魁. 喀斯特流域硫同位素地球化学与碳酸盐岩侵蚀[D]. 地球化学研究所. 中国科学院地球化学研究所,2007.
条目包含的文件
条目无相关文件。
个性服务
推荐该条目
保存到收藏夹
查看访问统计
导出为Endnote文件
谷歌学术
谷歌学术中相似的文章
[蒋颖魁]的文章
百度学术
百度学术中相似的文章
[蒋颖魁]的文章
必应学术
必应学术中相似的文章
[蒋颖魁]的文章
相关权益政策
暂无数据
收藏/分享
所有评论 (0)
暂无评论
 

除非特别说明,本系统中所有内容都受版权保护,并保留所有权利。